What participants receive

For all tasks, participants receive one folder per case containing three files:

File Access Contents
structured-prompt.json Directly visible to the agent Clinical variables, tool outputs, and free-text note sections (encounter details, history, physical/DRE findings)
*clinical-data.json Retrieved through MCP tool calls EHR-style records: radiology report, pathology report(s), prior clinical notes, PSA trend, laboratory panel, family history
prostate-modality-level-neural-representations.json Directly available Frozen foundation-model embeddings per modality; empty lists [] for missing modalities

The clinical-data file name is task-specific: prostate-biopsy-decision-clinical-data.json (Task 1), prostate-treatment-decision-clinical-data.json (Task 2), and prostate-time-to-recurrence-or-last-follow-up-clinical-data.json (Task 3).

Participants do not receive raw imaging (DICOM or WSI) at inference time; the agent reasons over the structured inputs, retrieved reports, and neural representations provided in these files. A full list of available variables and tool outputs is described on the Tools page.

Dataset

Split Cases Notes
Training 195 Radboudumc; real-world class distribution
Validation 75 Radboudumc; up to 5 submissions allowed
Test 250 100 cases from Karolinska Institute (external); 1 submission allowed

Training release: labels and reasoning

The three input files are provided for every training case. Ground-truth labels and reference reasoning are released only for a subset of training cases, and this subset is updated incrementally:

Task Input folders With label With reference reasoning
Task 1 195 91 91
Task 2 153 72 72
Task 3 75 75 0 (label only)

Label and reasoning files per task:

  • Task 1: prostate-biopsy-decision.json ("yes" / "no") + prostate-biopsy-decision-reasoning.json
  • Task 2: prostate-treatment-decision.json (treatment category) + prostate-treatment-decision-reasoning.json
  • Task 3: prostate-time-to-recurrence-or-last-follow-up.json (months_to_recurrence + event); no reference reasoning provided

Per-task variables

The main structured variables in structured-prompt.json are listed below. Additional EHR-style context (vitals, medications, comorbidities, social history, IPSS, encounter metadata, and free-text note sections) is included where available.

Task 1 — MRI-only diagnostic decision

Variable Type Description
psa float Serum PSA (ng/mL)
psap float Previous PSA value (ng/mL)
psav float PSA velocity (ng/mL/yr)
psad float PSA density (ng/mL/mL)
vol float Prostate volume (mL)
age int Age (years)
pirads string PI-RADS category (1–5)
dre string Digital rectal exam result
ct string Clinical T stage (e.g. cT1c)
cspca float Deep-learning-generated case-level likelihood score for csPCa (0–1)
(This is uncalibrated and not the same as a risk score)
bx string Previous biopsy status (Positive / Negative)
pmhx array of strings Problem list / past medical history containing the patient’s recorded comorbid conditions (e.g. ["Coronary artery disease", "Chronic kidney disease"])
Ground truth

Task 1 ground truth is provided in two files:

  • prostate-biopsy-decision.json: contains the biopsy decision as "yes" / "no".
  • prostate-biopsy-decision-reasoning.json: contains the structured reference reasoning.
Field Possible values Meaning
confidence clear / borderline / uncertain Confidence in the biopsy decision
variable_weights not_used / noted / important / decisive Importance assigned to each variable when making the decision
reveal_sequence List of strings: family_history, previous_notes, laboratory_results, psa_trend, radiology_report; additionally pathology_report for Task 2. Use [] if empty. Clinical-data sections/tools accessed during the decision; the order has no importance
free_text Free text Explanation of the main factors driving the decision

The ten variables included under variable_weights are age, fh (family history of prostate cancer), cspca, pirads, vol, psa, comorbidity (the recorded conditions listed under pmhx in structured-prompt.json), psad, dre, and bx.

Decision file: prostate-biopsy-decision.json

"yes"

Reasoning file: prostate-biopsy-decision-reasoning.json

{
  "confidence": "clear",
  "variable_weights": {
    "bx": "noted",
    "comorbidity": "noted",
    "cspca": "important",
    "psa": "important",
    "age": "important",
    "dre": "noted",
    "pirads": "decisive",
    "fh": "noted",
    "vol": "important",
    "psad": "important"
  },
  "reveal_sequence": [
    "family_history",
    "previous_notes",
    "laboratory_results",
    "psa_trend",
    "radiology_report"
  ],
  "free_text": "The PI-RADS 5 lesion, together with the markedly elevated and rapidly rising PSA, very high PSA density, and high csPCa probability, strongly supports proceeding to biopsy."
}

Task 2 — MRI + biopsy risk stratification

Task 2 shares the Task 1 variables, with biopsy pathology populated and the clinical-data file additionally containing a pathology_report.

Variable Type Description
bx_isup int Biopsy ISUP grade group
bx_gl_prim int Biopsy primary Gleason pattern
bx_gl_sec int Biopsy secondary Gleason pattern
Ground truth

Task 2 ground truth is provided in two files:

  • prostate-treatment-decision.json: contains one treatment category (string): active_surveillance / continued_surveillance / watchful_waiting / active_treatment. The decision is evaluated as a 4-class target using weighted F1.
  • prostate-treatment-decision-reasoning.json: contains the structured reference reasoning.

The reasoning file follows the same structure and uses the same possible values described for Task 1. The eleven variables included under variable_weights are bx_gl_prim, pirads, bx_isup, ct, fh, comorbidity, psa, bx_gl_sec, age, psad, and cspca.

Decision file: prostate-treatment-decision.json

"active_surveillance"

Reasoning file: prostate-treatment-decision-reasoning.json

{
  "confidence": "clear",
  "variable_weights": {
    "bx_gl_prim": "important",
    "pirads": "decisive",
    "bx_isup": "decisive",
    "ct": "important",
    "fh": "noted",
    "comorbidity": "noted",
    "psa": "important",
    "bx_gl_sec": "important",
    "age": "not_used",
    "psad": "important",
    "cspca": "not_used"
  },
  "reveal_sequence": [
    "family_history",
    "previous_notes",
    "laboratory_results",
    "psa_trend",
    "radiology_report",
    "pathology_report"
  ],
  "free_text": "Biopsy shows ISUP Grade Group 1 (Gleason 3+3) disease, with favorable clinical and imaging findings supporting active surveillance."
}

Task 3 — prostatectomy pathology prediction

Task 3 structured-prompt.json is minimal; most content is in the clinical-data file.

Variable Type Description
age int Age (years)
psa float Preoperative serum PSA (ng/mL)
dre string DRE result and DRE-derived clinical T stage (free text)
active_treatment_prior_to_surgery string / null Neoadjuvant treatment indicator (often null)

The clinical-data file provides radiology_report (volume, PSA density, PI-RADS, csPCa probability), pathology_report (biopsy Gleason/ISUP), surgical_pathology_report (prostatectomy Gleason/ISUP, pT stage, margins, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, LVI, lymph node status), previous_notes (e.g. 5-ARI use, Charlson Comorbidity Index), and family_history.

Ground truth and required output

Task 3 uses two files:

  • prostate-time-to-recurrence-or-last-follow-up.json: contains months_to_recurrence (float), representing the time in months, and event (int), where 1 indicates observed BCR and 0 indicates a censored observation.
  • prostate-time-to-recurrence-or-last-follow-up-reasoning.json: contains a free-text explanation supporting the predicted outcome. No reference reasoning is provided in the training release, but participants must generate this file as part of their output.

Outcome file: prostate-time-to-recurrence-or-last-follow-up.json

{
  "months_to_recurrence": 65.7,
  "event": 0
}
Neural representations

prostate-modality-level-neural-representations.json provides frozen foundation-model embeddings per modality:

Modality Shape Notes
MRI 1 × 1024-dim Always a single vector
Biopsy slide(s) 0–3 × 960-dim One 960-dim vector per slide; multiple slides possible
Prostatectomy slide(s) 0–3 × 960-dim One 960-dim vector per slide; multiple slides possible

Missing modalities are represented as an empty list []. For example, a Task 2 patient with two biopsy slide representations and no prostatectomy slides has the following structure:

{
  "MRI image": [
    [/* 1024-dimensional MRI vector */]
  ],
  "Biopsy slide": [
    [/* 960-dimensional biopsy slide vector 1 */],
    [/* 960-dimensional biopsy slide vector 2 */]
  ],
  "Prostatectomy slide": []
}

Underlying imaging and acquisition

The structured inputs provided to participants are derived from clinical imaging acquired as part of routine prostate cancer care. The table below describes the original imaging devices and protocols for reference.

Modality Device Resolution / Protocol
Multiparametric MRI Siemens 3T/1.5T and Philips 3T (Radboudumc, CWZ)

Siemens 3T/1.5T, Philips 3T, GE 1.5T (Karolinska Institute)
Axial plane; T2w, ADC maps, DWI with multiple b-values
Biopsy WSI (H&E) 3DHISTECH PANNORAMIC 1000 (Radboudumc, CWZ)

Aperio GT 450 Scanner (Karolinska Institute)`
0.25 µm/pixel (PANNORAMIC 1000)

0.26 µm/pixel (Aperio GT 450)
Prostatectomy WSI (H&E) 3DHISTECH PANNORAMIC 1000 (Radboudumc, CWZ) 0.25 µm/pixel

Data origins and Domain shift

CHIMERA-agent builds on the CHIMERA challenge at MICCAI 2025, extending it with agent-based reasoning and sequential clinical decision-making. Data for CHIMERA-agent is collected independently.

All training and validation data originate from Radboud University Medical Center (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands and Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital (CWZ), Nijmegen, The Netherlands. The test set includes cases from Radboudumc, CWZ, and Karolinska Institute, Solna, Sweden. MRI examinations were interpreted by board-certified radiologists following PI-RADS v2.1. Biopsy procedures were performed by experienced urologists, and histopathology was assessed by board-certified pathologists specializing in genitourinary pathology.

Participants should expect domain shift between training and test cohorts due to differences in MRI acquisition parameters, H&E staining protocols, and scanner hardware.

External data and pretrained models

Participants who wish to train or fine-tune their models using external data and / or pretrained models are permitted provided that they are freely and publicly accessible under a permissive open-source license (e.g. Creative Commons, MIT, BSD, Open Database License) and described in the challenge manuscript.